I design and implement services where the patient follows a clear path — from intake, through a doctor's review, to receiving medication.

Individual quote
For clinics and medical brands that want to issue prescriptions and guide patients online.
I build services for clinics, e-prescription brands, and medical products that need to take a patient from intake to a decision — not just "have a pretty health website".
The path: questionnaire, clinical review, document, optionally a pharmacy. The patient should know what happens at each step — not guess from icons.
Catalogue, payment, fulfillment. When a product without a clear process burns ad budget, the problem is not "not enough leads". The problem is friction on the path.
I design and ship the product. The medical model, contracts with doctors and the pharmacy stay on your side. I do not pretend to be a law firm and I do not sell "compliance in the package".
A patient does not buy a slider with a smiling doctor. They buy the sense that someone owns the process: question, decision, document, pickup. If they get lost between "book a visit" and a form, they go back to a competitor or a walk-in pharmacy.
A ready-made medical SaaS can be fast at the start and expensive at scale: fees, limits, no code, terms you do not negotiate. Your own platform is a product you run — not an account they can terminate.
Patient path first, then code. No "digital health transformation" theatre.
Who the patient is, what they should get (consult, e-prescription, product), who issues the document, where payment and fulfillment go. We draw the path before I open an editor.
Questionnaire, states, messages, cart or a fee for the review. You see friction on paper, not after the ad campaign starts.
The service, panels, payments, the integrations you actually need. Status updates along the way. No six weeks of silence.
Your platform, your hosting, documentation. Care after launch, because the first real patient always finds a case that was not on the slide.
A clinic template looks like a clinic. It does not walk the patient through. Medical SaaS starts fast, then the fee, the intake cap, and no access to your data turn out not to be an "implementation detail".
A dedicated platform costs more at the start because you are buying ownership. Path psychology, integrations you choose, and code that stays with you. Telemedicine without control of the process is just ads that burn budget.
Straight answers before we book a call.
It is an individual quote. A questionnaire plus e-prescription is a different job than a catalogue, payments, and a pharmacy. After a conversation you get a scope and a number, not an empty from-to.
I am not a law firm and I do not sell a certificate. I design and ship the service inside the model you already have or are building with your own doctors, lawyers, and pharmacy. If nobody can issue the document, code will not replace that.
It depends on the path, the integrations, and how fast decisions land on your side. A first working slice can be weeks; a full catalogue and fulfillment takes longer. I do not paint a date on a kickoff slide.
Yes — if there is someone and something to connect. I build the catalogue, checkout, and order handoff. The pharmacy contract and settlement stay with you. I do not promise a magical "pharmacy network in the package".
You rent SaaS. At scale you pay a cut, wait on their roadmap, and you do not leave with your data without pain. Your own platform is more expensive at the start and cheaper when you stop being a "small customer" in someone else's product.
Yes. I operate legally in Poland, I issue an invoice, and you can deduct VAT. A conversation is not a contract — first we check whether we are a good fit.