Technical SEO that lets Google find your site
I audit, fix, and update the technical layer of your website so search engines can crawl, index, and rank it.
What's included?
- Technical audit: indexing, crawlability, Core Web Vitals, structured data, and Search Console errors
- Fixes and updates: meta tags, sitemap, robots, redirects, canonicals, page speed, and mobile
- Aftercare: Search Console setup and a clear report of what changed
Individual quote
For websites that exist but stay invisible in Google — I find and fix the technical blockers.
Who is technical SEO for?
I fix the technical layer of sites that "are online" but that Google cannot see, cannot understand, or punishes for errors nobody reads in Search Console.
The site exists, Google is silent
You have a website, maybe even content, and the queries do not move. Before someone sells you "rankings and links", it is worth checking whether the crawler even enters and indexes.
After a redesign or a migration
New site, old URLs, vanished traffic. Canonicals, 404s, a sitemap from a previous era. That is not "the algorithm". That is usually an unfinished move.
Poznań and Warsaw
Audit and fixes on your stack, remotely. Sites in Poznań and Warsaw go through the same process — WordPress, Nuxt, whatever, as long as there is access. You do not need an agency with a 40-person "SEO content" department.
Why "SEO" does nothing if Google cannot enter the site
The agency writes copy while robots.txt blocks a folder. Or the page weighs eight megabytes on a phone, canonicals point at the void, and Search Console has been shouting about indexing for six months. That is not a "weak content" problem. It is a technical blocker.
Technical SEO does not promise a ranking for "website Poznań". It gives the search engine a chance: crawl, index, understandable content, speed, structured data. Without that, content and links work in a vacuum.
How technical SEO actually works
Audit, plan, fixes, Search Console. No 80-page report nobody reads.
Audit
Indexing, crawl, Core Web Vitals, sitemap, robots, canonicals, redirects, structured data, Search Console errors. A list of facts, not "recommendations to consider".
Plan
What blocks hardest, what we touch first, what we leave because it is content or off-site. You see the order and the scope before anyone touches code.
Fixes
Meta, sitemap, robots, redirects, canonicals, speed, mobile, schema where it helps. Status updates along the way — not silence and not a slide that says "on-page 40%".
After
Search Console set up, a change report, what to watch. So I do not disappear on the day Google finally starts crawling.
What else is included in technical SEO?
- A check that Google can enter, index, and not get lost in duplicates.
- Sitemap, robots, canonicals, redirects — boring work that decides whether the new site lives.
- Core Web Vitals and mobile: not "pretty design", but whether a phone can even load the content.
- Structured data where it helps the engine understand the page — not 15 schema types "because that is what you do".
- A report: what was broken, what I changed, what technique will not fix (content, links, time).
Why not a package of "SEO + 20 articles + links"?
Copy on a site the crawler does not index is a cost. Links into a canonical mess are a cost with interest. First you unblock crawl. Then writing and linking start to make sense.
I do not sell rankings. I sell the layer without which Google cannot find you, or finds a version you did not want. The rest — content, PR, time — you do on purpose, not instead of fixing the sitemap.
Frequently asked questions about technical SEO
Straight answers before we book a call.
It is an individual quote. Auditing a small calling-card site is a different job than a store with a thousand canonical variants. After a conversation and a look at Search Console you get a scope, not a subscription "for rankings".
No. Nobody honest guarantees queries. I guarantee that I fix what can be fixed technically: indexing, crawl, the errors the tools show. Rankings also take content, links, and time.
Technical: can the crawler enter, understand, avoid duplicates, does the site even work on a phone. Content: is there something to read and will anyone link it. Without the first, the second often never starts.
Yes, if you want to know what Google actually sees, not guess from a rank tracker. As part of aftercare I set up GSC and show you where to look — I do not leave you with a login and a screenshot.
The audit itself can be days. Fixes depend on the stack and who implements (me or your team). A migration with hundreds of redirects is not "we will tweak meta on Friday".
Yes. I operate legally in Poland, I issue an invoice, and you can deduct VAT. A conversation is not a contract — first we check whether the problem is technical, or whether someone sold you rankings blind.
Yes. Audit and fixes are remote, on your stack. I am based in Poznań; Warsaw sites go through the same process. We can meet in person when I am in the city — it is not required to start.